> > 1- because it's a workaround, not a very clean design
>
> Until I see a radically better one, and a good reason *why* it should be
> introduced, it will work well.

Well I am glad to see you turning on to the one true practice of software
production: XP <g>

We all know that MVC is a pretty simple pattern and having the imports from
graphic stuff (even if lazy loaded) in the same classes that hold logic
information in memory screams "factor me!".  Heck I don't need to read the
pattern doodoo thingy book to know that.

> > 3- If somebody else is doing it, you should let them.
>

<snip_on_disagreement>

hmmm... really people want to work on what they want to work.  Preventing
people from cleaning your code if they want to is bad open source management
<trust_me_on_that/>

Honestly I am glad somebody is looking at it instead of holding it with a 10
foot pole.  Everyone is saying "pheeeww" maybe we should factor this thing,
and I am glad.

> Convince me :-)

it's not you and me, there are tons of capable people on the list and you
have to let people work on what they want.

Listen Rickard, I have worked enough in your code to know that you are a
very capable coder, but that also sometimes... well... like everyone else,
really.  So let's show some pudor and common sense and let other capable
coders take our code.

I did it with you, do it with others,

yeah, that's what love is all about..

kind regards

marc


Reply via email to