forgot this is
http://www.telkel.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137
marc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 3:12 PM
> To: jBoss Developer
> Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] Performance Question....
>
>
> As I said Rickard looked at it.
>
> Rickard could you put your partial findings under the bugzilla
> "speed" entry
> so that we can take the discussion there and start looking at it
> seriously?
>
> It is too big a difference between jboss 1.0 and jboss2.0 to be the real
> thing... (again the invocation layers are the same) it must be something
> silly,
>
>
> marc
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy Lewis
> > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 3:04 PM
> > To: jBoss Developer
> > Subject: Re: [jBoss-Dev] Performance Question....
> >
> >
> > Ah. I wholly misunderstood....but thanks for clarifying. We might
> > be able to
> > devot some time to hunting it down. Do you have any clues?
> >
> > marc fleury wrote:
> >
> > > Andy,
> > >
> > > I am actually saying that there is something silly IN jboss2.0
> > and that we
> > > know about it.
> > >
> > > Others have reported the slow invocation, it probably has
> > nothing to do with
> > > you and your installation. I will try to address it ASAP, stay tuned
> > >
> > > marc
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy Lewis
> > > > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 2:42 PM
> > > > To: jBoss Developer
> > > > Subject: Re: [jBoss-Dev] Performance Question....
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Excellent! Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > I'll go forward on the assumption that we are all idiots here of
> > > > one form or
> > > > another (which I suspected anyway) :) and we'll try to figure
> > out what we
> > > > screwed up.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > marc fleury wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > jboss 1.0 RMI call were at 3ms
> > > > > jboss 1.0 IN-VM calls were <0.1ms
> > > > >
> > > > > jboss 2.0 uses the SAME invocation layer.
> > > > > So there is something really silly going on, it will be the
> > > > first we look at
> > > > > as soon as we address the TestBeans.jar thing (almost there).
> > > > Rickard was
> > > > > tracking some class loader silliness but it seems the kid just
> > > > died by the
> > > > > road while climbing his own mountain ;-).... we will get the
> > > > corpse to the
> > > > > top, don't you worry!
> > > > >
> > > > > regards
> > > > >
> > > > > marc
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy Lewis
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 2:33 PM
> > > > > > To: jBoss Developer
> > > > > > Subject: [jBoss-Dev] Performance Question....
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We've been doing some internal testing with EJBs using jBoss
> > > > and have seen
> > > > > > function calls between entity beans on the same server taking a
> > > > > > long time -
> > > > > > like about a second. They were slow enough that output from
> > > > them could be
> > > > > > "visually" timed. I know performance hasn't been really
> > > > addressed yet, but
> > > > > > this seemed a bit much.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Are we just doing something really stupid? (my first
> > > > assumption would be
> > > > > > probably yes) Are all calls between beans going through RMI? (no
> > > > > > in-VM optimization?)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any comments here are appreciated....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks....
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
