Hi again,
One quick note. Rickard, I needed to use JCheckBox (!) in
Container to get some metadata about security. Obviously this
isn't the right way :-). Could you take a look?
Thanks,
Dan
On 6 Aug 00, at 18:07, "jBoss Developer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Some security stuff is in CVS now. I'll post tomorrow with an
> explanation of what's there and what needs to be done. I did a
> clean checkout and it compiles and runs, but be sure to let me
> know if anyone has problems...
>
> -Dan
>
> On 6 Aug 00, at 17:26, Dan OConnor wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Messed up my local CVS. :-( Might be a while...
> >
> > -Dan
> >
> > On 6 Aug 00, at 16:27, Dan OConnor wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I'm about to attempt to check in some files related to security.
> > > Since no one had any objections to the architecture I proposed, I
> > > have basically a "no-op" skeleton for it: static client methods to set
> > > the principal and credential; role mapping that eliminates the
> > > indirection and uses the role as-is; no bean-to-bean context
> > > propagation; and authentication that just checks the password by
> > > making sure it is the same as the user name. We can add more
> > > realistic functionality next. (If there is a null principal,
> > > authentication/authorization is skipped. This is so people who want
> > > to can play with the security stuff, and people who don't can ignore
> > > it for now.)
> > >
> > > I've never used CVS before, so I apologize in advance for all the
> > > chaos I'm about to cause. (I had to change a lot of key files, for
> > > things like propagation of security contexts...)
> > >
> > > -Dan
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
