No the implementation of the cache wont'. In fact, like I said I need a
"EntityInstanceCache"
marc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rickard �berg
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 11:31 PM
> To: jBoss Developer
> Subject: Re: [jBoss-Dev] Cache structures
>
>
> Hi!
>
> marc fleury wrote:
> > Whereas I insist that "ease of use" is the main goal (i.e. that
> in 80% cases
> > developers are going to create and call methods to bench complex PKs and
> > most will not override the hash equals correctly or
> effectively) and in that
> > case we are sitting much prettier, I also believe it is not an absolute
> > priority to introduce some complexity in the cache at this point.
> >
> > I will make the cache structures pluggable so we can use either the base
> > cache or the advanced one based on jboss.xml. That is what the
> architecture
> > is there for and only the client needs to be a bit smarter but
> that is minor
> > changes. The EntityInstanceCache is also imho a missing piece
> of the puzzle
> > and I will add that but the implementation of the actual cache
> will be the
> > old one. Use the new one as needed, pluggable.
> >
> > How does this sound?
>
> Well, since Simone is working on a more advanced cache for both entity
> and stateful wouldn't it be double work?
>
> Simone, what's your status?
>
> /Rickard
>
> --
> Rickard �berg
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.telkel.com
> http://www.jboss.org
> http://www.dreambean.com
>
>
