> > What do you think? > > I can't see how that would be implemented... sorry :-( (and yes I've > spent considerable thought on this, since it would be VERY nice to be ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ hmmmmm ... > able to deploy with several protocols at once. Just don't see how it > could work) Again I don't see a fundamental problem. It can be all modeled as contextual information that travels with the MethodInvocation... It is not a simple implementation change and would make some layers more complex. In effect I find that the access to EJB creation (through create or find) are a bit disseminated but that is another subject. marc > :-( > > /R > > -- > Rickard �berg > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.telkel.com > http://www.jboss.org > http://www.dreambean.com > >
- [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadata broken Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadata broken Sebastien Alborini
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadata broken Dan OConnor
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadata broken Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadata broken Dan OConnor
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadata br... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... Dan OConnor
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMet... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMet... marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMet... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMet... Dan OConnor
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMet... marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMet... Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMet... marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMet... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMet... Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMet... marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMet... marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMet... Rickard �berg
