marc fleury wrote: > > No, the protocol support is not just an implementation issue. Which > > protocol should the getEJBObject() value support? Sorry, won't work. > > Ok rickard, let's not waste each other time today. You can travel the CI > with the MI and implement the getEJBObject from the context accordingly. It > is even pretty straightforward. Small implementation, but completely an > implementation issue. Give it some thought. It's not an implementation issue. /Rickard -- Rickard �berg Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.telkel.com http://www.jboss.org http://www.dreambean.com
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... Joel Shellman
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadata broken Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadata broken Sebastien Alborini
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadata broken Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadata broken Jeremiah Johnson
