-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 6:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; marc fleury
Subject: Re: FW: [jBoss-Dev] Commenting jboss.jcml
I'm not sure I understand all of your problem,
but you might look at the ModelMBean as well, its set up with descriptors
so that you can define operations and get/sets that actuall call methods on
other objects to satisfy them. Its real code so you can subclass and
override what you don't like.
Heather
"marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/14/2000 02:09:08 PM
To: "jmx-experts@Sun. COM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: "Aaron Mulder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FW: [jBoss-Dev] Commenting jboss.jcml
It seems we already have a solution :)
marc
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rickard �berg
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 7:00 AM
To: jBoss Developer
Subject: Re: [jBoss-Dev] Commenting jboss.jcml
Aaron Mulder wrote:
> The jboss.jcml configuration entries for Minerva are getting
> pretty large. I wonder if it would be useful to add a comment hook where
> a MBean could (optionally) declare a function
> getDescription(String parameter)
> and if it's present the JCML writer could add inline XML comments
> describing the parameters. Than again, that may just make the whole
thing
> even more muddled. Thoughts?
Well, if you make a dynamic MBean instead of a standard MBean (i.e.
implement javax.management.DynamicMBean) you can provide your own
MBeanInfo which can contain this. Then we can easily change the
Configuration MBean to add comments to the generated jcml :-)
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com
