Dan Christopherson wrote:
> If you built and ran the same interface under both jBoss and straight
> JavaIDL, that implies that under jBoss you had an EJB, whereas under
> JavaIDL you just had a distributed object. The EJB in jBoss has quite a
> bit of overhead to satisfy the component contracts. Have you run this
> under straight rmi/JRMP? that might be a better comparison to JavaIDL
> (unless I'm talking nonsense)
RMI/JRMP will always give you a minimal of 2-3 ms overhead. I am curious
how JavaIDL can avoid this overhead... client and server are different
VM's right?
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com
