On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Dan OConnor wrote:
> On 11 Oct 00, at 13:00, Daniel Schulze wrote:
> 
> > Two possible ways to solve it:
> > 1. bring the transaction stuff into the jaws code and use two
> > transactions for this operation (reuse the old code)
> > 
> There is nothing wrong with this, in my opinion. In general, 
> persistence code needs to be able to have some control over the 
> transactional context in which it accesses a resouce (e.g. for 
> optimistic concurrency).
> 
> -Dan

Well, good point.

\Daniel

Reply via email to