Hi!
Oleg Nitz wrote:
> Aaron Mulder wrote:
> >> Sorry - I didn't keep the original thread. But someone was
> >> discussing using more than one TM in jBoss (one per EJB JAR, or one per
> >> container configuration?). Just wanted to mention that a change was made
> >> a while back to make Minerva cache the TM, since the lookup was apparently
> >> taking significant time. There are probably other places where that was
> >> done too.
> Castor also caches TM, for the same reason.
>
> Rickard �berg wrote:
> R�> Good point. The configurability of TM's was put in there "just in case"
> R�> and was not entirely thought through. I am leaning more and more towards
> R�> not having it configurable, as the semantics would be a little to weird.
>
> R�> Anyone have good reasons to keep it? How to solve any potential problems
> R�> between clashing TM's in one JVM? Anyone *see* the potential problems?
> I vote for single TM per JVM.
> I don't know any cases where multiple TMs per JVM are really needed,
> and I believe that the price for such flexibility would be too high.
I agree. If noone comes up with compelling reasons why several TM's
would be good, then we switch and take out the TM configurability.
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com
