At 12:35 2/11/00 +0100, you wrote: >> The argument is >> that when the same source file imports both org.jboss.XXX and >> org.apache.XXX, or when jBoss distributes Tomcat interceptors, then this >> does not qualify as "mere aggregation", though it is certainly still >> distributed via some medium. correct. >Correct. If a file under GPL imports org.apache.*, the >GPL requires that the Apache code be under GPL which is >a conflict with the Apache license. Same problem if some >Apache code imports org.jboss.*. right. Cheers, Pete *------------------------------------------------------* | "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want | | to test a man's character, give him power." | | -Abraham Lincoln | *------------------------------------------------------*
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] jBoss, etc. & Avalon Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] jBoss, etc. & Avalon Dan OConnor
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] jBoss, etc. & Avalon Daniel Schulze
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] jBoss, etc. & Avalon Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] jBoss, etc. & Avalon Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] jBoss, etc. & Avalon Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] jBoss, etc. & Avalon Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] jBoss, etc. & Avalon Peter Donald
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] jBoss, etc. & Avalon marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] jBoss, etc. & Avalon Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Aaron Mulder
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Ole Husgaard
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Ole Husgaard
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Ole Husgaard
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Ole Husgaard
