Ok sorry I am late on this discussion,

I just upgraded my PC and it nuked outlook there for a while, full day of
cold sweat down my spine.

comments below


|True, but since we cannot change Tomcat it was the best/easiest way to
|do it.

that is correct see previous mail, we don't control the stuff and we have a
way to implement integration without requiring API changes.  That is a about
the only time I believe that implicit has an edge as it doesn't require
"API" just correct implementations.

|> a) makes the ContainerFactory (maybe afterwards the J2EEDeployer,
|> EmbeddedTomcat) code more readable
|
|Yes. Agree.

Yes but beware of "repackage-itis", even Rickard falls prey to it sometimes
:)

|> b) allows for a reusability of J2EEDeployer, ContainerFactory and
|> EmbeddedTomcat also when having
|> "non-flat" deployment structures.
|
|Again, don't follow. What do you mean by this?

I am not sure I understand this fully either, but the only thing I do see is
the container stack today is very "static" we do say
addInterceptor(new something());

where a factory approach to that would be more powerful.

we would feed a list of "interceptor XML" and have the factory do

addInterceptor(beanConf.nextInterceptorClass().newInstance());


That would be good :)

marc




Reply via email to