Since we were on coding standards..hope we follow these
http://mindprod.com/unmain.html



> ----------
> From:         marc fleury
> Reply To:     jBoss Developer
> Sent:         Tuesday, December 12, 2000 11:40 AM
> To:   jBoss Developer
> Subject:      RE: [jBoss-Dev] More: Proxy & handle changes
> 
> Sorry I need to be more clear on this..
> 
> the problem for me is that kawa seems very happy with the "
> method
> {
> }
> 
> indentation and makes it automated.
> 
> most tools just follow the SUN coding standard of
> method {
> }
> 
> and naturally indent in that way and get very confused by the first one.
> 
> Frankly it's anoying either way (there is some clarity to the first, a SUN
> standard and tools behind the second )
> 
> as with all important problem I propose a toss up :)
> heads we go A tails we go B...
> 
> :)))
> 
> how do we do a that on our mailing lists??????
> 
> ah man simple things in life really are complicated sometimes:)
> 
> any other way? to make a draw?  i will be glad to twist anyJ non-standard
> conf either way.
> 
> marc
> 
> 
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury
> |Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 8:21 PM
> |To: jBoss Developer
> |Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] More: Proxy & handle changes
> |
> |
> |guys the SUN standard is very clear :)
> |
> |marc
> |
> |
> ||-----Original Message-----
> ||From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rickard Oberg
> ||Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 1:02 PM
> ||To: jBoss Developer
> ||Subject: Re: [jBoss-Dev] More: Proxy & handle changes
> ||
> ||
> ||> This brings up a topic I've been intending to ask the list about. Are
> ||> there coding standards for JBoss?
> ||
> ||Not formal, no. You're encouraged to use the style employed in the bulk
> of
> ||the code, i.e. "Rickard style".
> ||
> ||> I've been using the templates in
> ||> src/etc (which are out of date, BTW, re: [jJ]Boss and [L]GPL) along
> with
> ||> what appears to be the predominant indenting style (which I think of
> as
> ||> "Rickard style"), which seems to be:
> ||>  - indents are 3 spaces
> ||>  - braces go on a new line at the same indent level as the previous
> line
> ||>  - otherwise standard Java style as from Sun.
> ||
> ||Correct.
> ||
> ||I try to let people use their preferred indenting/bracing standard
> ||(discussions on this topic tends to get religious and don't ever end),
> but
> ||to me anything other than the above mentioned is unreadable so if
> |I need to
> ||read code to get something done, and it doesn't follow the above I
> usually
> ||"fix it up" in the process.
> ||
> ||> I'm not hugely fussed about the exact number of spaces an indent is,
> but
> ||> I am fussed about making things consistent, at the very least within
> ||> each file. I also *despise* tab characters - there is a lot of code in
> ||> JBoss that just can't be read without adjusting the size of a tab
> ||> character to something other than 8 - this is simply nonsense.</foam>
> ||
> ||Agree. I think I used tab chars in the beginning but now I only
> |use spaces.
> ||
> ||/Rickard
> ||
> ||ps. And yes, I agree with your conclusions re: explicit package imports.
> ||
> ||
> ||
> ||
> ||
> |
> |
> |
> 
> 

Reply via email to