marc fleury wrote:
> ok the CL grand daddy needs to be the System ones (the classes from
> jboss.jar)
Right. With your definition of System that makes sense. With mine it
didn't.
> |> That the parent CL is the "System" CL is another matter entirely,
> |
> |Nooooo, the system does not have a CL. The system does not have any
> |concrete substance, it is just the structure of the applications. The
> |nodes are the applications, but the links between them is the "system".
>
> pffffff. can we agree on the "system" = jboss.jar classes? and associated
> drivers, connectors etc etc?
Oki.
> system = JMX loaded server.
As you wish.
> application = ContainerFactory (or to be written application factory) loaded
> client modules
Alright. Deal.
> |> why this should be seen at the XML layer is beyond me :)
> |
> |We just use XML as a convenient way to denote how the applications
> |relate.
>
> not to the system rickard... we all agree that XML is the proper way to
> describe the modules relationships
Yes.
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
