|Is this really true? Would it not be possible to figure out what classes |need to be shared from ejb-refs and then pull all of those out of the |individual EARs (so that they're not picked up by the leaf classloaders) |and put them in the logical application's parent classloader? well in fact if you looks closely the spec calls for defining the *classes* themselves and from the first moment I read this (Like Long Time Ago ;-) I thought it was for "classes-CL hookup" short of the fully automated "we will find the EAR" like you propose, we can define logical modules (IMHO), bar that we will need to do something hardcoded and implementation dependent like the CL tree in XML. marc | |Just a thought. | |Toby. | | |
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] The Dumbo problem (Big EARs) Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] The Dumbo problem (Big EARs) marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] The Dumbo problem (Big EARs) Mike Lueders
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] The Dumbo problem (Big EARs) marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] The Dumbo problem (Big EARs) Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] The Dumbo problem (Big EARs) Toby Allsopp
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] The Dumbo problem (Big EARs... Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] The Dumbo problem (Big... marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] The Dumbo problem ... Rickard Oberg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] The Dumbo problem ... marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] The Dumbo problem (Big EARs... marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] The Dumbo problem (Big EARs) marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] The Dumbo problem (Big EARs) Jay Walters
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] The Dumbo problem (Big EARs) marc fleury
