|so we would be looking
|at
| Orb
| / \b
| Orb
| / \
|a Orb
| / \
| c d
|
|The rules of reloading applying just like in the abc case
|
|HEY this could be totally wrong (at least the aggregation part) it's
|research...
|
hehe it is wrong the real structure is
orb orb
/ \ / \
a b c
and the only thing we need to put in XML are the set of dependent classes
marc
|</looking>
|
||
||Note that not the entire container must be cycled, it is enough that the
||caches are cleared and the pools emptied. This is a fairly lightweight
|
|yes, trivially
|
||operation and the only drawback is that usage of the container will be
||somewhat slow immediately after the clearing (as the caches and
|pools build
||up again). But the clearing itself is pretty fast (HashMap.clear()'s
||basically).
||
||Comments?
||
|
|nope, glad you are off the high horsey and doing investigation, you *are*
|alive :) trust me I have been here many times before in my
|research years...
|you think you are the first human being looking at something and then turns
|out the Russians did it 10 years ago (in our case, the smalltalk folks
|already manage complex module deployment so do the VB guys :) and we smile
|stupidly... keep going almost there...
|
|marc
|
|PS1: it is truly an intellectual "amusement" at this point, I
|don't think we
|will really need this in *OUR* codebase. In fact writing the deployer that
|talks to these orbs is not something that I would want to spend 2
|days on :)
|I am happy with the classloader mechanism
|
|PS2: now here is what is really going to blow your mind
|from my "extensive databases" I believe the first trace of this dates 1999,
|so someone, somewhere, probably a vendor has already looked at this ;-)
|wanna change paternity of this ?
|
|
||/Rickard
||
||
||
||
||
|
|
|
