Do you plan on factoring the new names into the code base Marc. By this I
mean do the package names need to change?
Micheal
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury
> Sent: 22 January 2001 04:46
> To: Jaws@Kpi. Com. Au; spyderMQ@egroups. com; jBoss Developer; jBoss
> Subject: [jBoss-Dev] Name change
>
>
> Hello folks,
>
> sorry for the massive crosspost, but it is something that
> concerns everyone.
>
> We are very pleased by the way things are looking and we are truly looking
> forward to this year in jboss' life.
>
> so a couple of marketeers on the list (hello edwin hello vaughn) have
> remarked that our naming scheme is incoherent. These marketeers have
> requested that we unify our naming.
>
> You got it baby.
>
> The word is JBoss...
>
> JBossTX
> includes new TX and old Minerva
>
> JBossMQ
> (ex spyderMQ)
>
> JBossNS
> JNP stuff
>
> JBossServer
> the main JMX server + EJB container
>
> JBossCMP
> Jaws stuff
>
> JBossGUI
> all ejx related stuff + admin
>
> JBoss remains the full suite package you download. got it?
>
> We toyed with the idea of doing JBossEJB(or JBossContainer), but
> we decided
> "naaaah.."
>
> So there it is. For those in the back of the class that have
> been sleeping
> all along, the goal is to continue building momentum in the brand
> as well as
> leveraging it in the marketplace. yeah got it now?
>
> alright..
>
> Ok so go kick some ass ... (bottom line)
>
> ________________________________
> "All the wood behind one arrow!"
> --some funky dude at SUN 1991 --
> ________________________________
>
>
