Hi Marc

I've been testing primarily against 2.0 final.

I've also run it against a build from CVS that I pulled down
earlier this week. The few ejbs I've deployed so far have
worked fine.

The main issues for me with respect to Jboss 2.1 are
a) changes in jboss.dtd and jaws.dtd
b) changes in the ejb dtds for EJB 2.0 spec
c) New EJB 2.0 features in Jboss 2.1 (eg message driven beans) 

I am assuming the future releases of JBoss 2.1 and Together
4.3 will both support EJB 2.0. I may have to create a second deployer for JBoss 2.1
and EJB 2.0. I'm hoping not too (at least not yet) I'd like
to migrate the existing deployer to support both 1.1 and 2.0
specs if I can. It (the deployer) will also need extending to support
some of the upcoming Together 4.3 stuff.

Mike


On Wed, 24 Jan 2001 08:59:31 -0800 marc fleury <marc fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> 
wrote:

> Hello mike, 
> 
> I suppose you are using JBoss2.0? or are you working with JBoss2.1?
> 
> marc
> 
> 
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike
> |Swainston-Rainford
> |Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 3:31 AM
> |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Subject: [jBoss-Dev] JBoss Deployer for Together
> |
> |
> |Hi
> |
> |I have just about completed the Jboss deployer and I'm
> |hoping to release a beta soon for more extensive testing.
> |
> |I'm trying to get the deployer included with the upcoming
> |4.3 release of Together. So hopefully a version for 4.2 will come out
> |as a zip install followed by an 'official'
> |deployer in 4.3 later this quarter.
> |
> |I have got it to a more or less feature complete stage as
> |far as the jaws and jboss dtds go. It creates the three xml
> |files and ejx is quite happy to read them.
> |
> |I've put some new nodes on the Together Assembler diagram for container
> |configurations and resource managers.
> |
> |I've also added new property panes for the JBoss specific
> |stuff like 'drop table on undeploy' etc.
> |
> |regards
> |
> |
> |Mike Swainston-Rainford
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> 





Reply via email to