Hi!
"Castro, David" wrote:
> Actually, I wonder if there is another bug here. I dont think we ever
> marshall exceptions that are thrown by an ejb method in same-VM operation.
> This is a bug I think. When running non optimized, we serialize parameters
> and return values, but not exceptions, which is what leads to the bug we are
> seeing here.
>
> Once the patch lands, we wont see this error any more, but... It still
> bothers me that we would not marshall exceptions. With non-optimized
> operation we basically guarantee that everything will be passed by value not
> reference, and I think exceptions should not be any exception to this.
> (heh.. no pun intended :)
This is a good point actually. It should be fixed. I have some ideas...
regards,
Rickard
--
Rickard Öberg
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
