Hey Bill & Sacha, As per our earlier conversation, I made this change in RH. I ran unit test and could not notice any unexpected behaviour.
Vladimir >Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 15:34:08 -0400 >From: Bill Burke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Vladimir Blagojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: Sacha Labourey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: Feedback >Yes this is much better. Thanks. Keep it coming... >Bill > -----Original Message----- > From: Vladimir Blagojevic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:02 PM > To: Bill Burke > Cc: Sacha Labourey > Subject: RE: Feedback > > > Hey, > > > viewId, is this a JG thing? Yes, that would probably be better. > > Yeah it is from JG. All members are in "virtual synchrony", all see same > views hence viewID is same across members until it changes by join/crash > etc. > > Quick check on API . ViewId as object is retrievable from JChannel which > is available from HARMIPartition. I'd use only > > public long ViewId.getId() to get long value viewId > > rather than whole object ViewId. Stuff this long value in HARMClient and > upon replicant update check if clients viewid long is equal to the one we > have on server , if not update client's recipient stubs. > > Seems ok? > > Vladimir > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
