Hey,
>
> riiiigght....
>
> the idea of "test the domain *name*" doesn't sound soo bad after all.
>
> The reason is that it is a simple place to define the integration (by
> scoping your domain in JBoss's). Therefore JBoss will assume that you are
> "JBoss" aware and that your management is in place... working on String will
> for sure be safe :)
>
> hehe, I guess the second solution will have its problems too. That is when
> you know your codebase is too big, a simple change triggers hell
>
I wouldn't "blame" it on our codebase, I would blame it on JMX/JDMK eng
team for such a big oversight. This is basically a bug - see latest
jmx-forum thread. I first noticed this thing when I tried to play with jmx
relation package. Classloader in RoleInfo constructor is also essentially
hardcoded too. So this classloader problem seem to be in
more than a few places in jmx code.
So we have to fallback on "reserve" solution. Scott told me last nite he
was putting up something....
Vlada
> marc
> |
> |----- Original Message -----
> |From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> |To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> |Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 7:30 PM
> |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Nested JMX Service Groups...??!
> |
> |
> |> Oh-oh,
> |>
> |> Classloaders. So I happely planned my night to add those two
> |lines and go
> |> out with friends but then I realized how deep the rabbit hole goes.
> |>
> |> I was stunned to realize that:
> |>
> |> server.isInstanceOf(mbeanName,"org.jboss.util.Service") always returns
> |> false and here is why.
> |>
> |> MBeanServerImpl implementation of this method obviously has to load our
> |> service class to do type check. It uses classloader that loaded
> |> MBeanServerImpl which in our case is AppClassLoader. AppClassLoader in
> |> turn can't "see" any of our jboss classes since they were loaded with
> |> Mlet.
> |>
> |> I can't see no way to tell to MBeanServer to use other
> |classloader nor did
> |> JMX engineers hooked wires for CCLs. So as soon ClassNotFoundException is
> |> caught (inside MbeanServer.isInstanceOf) false is returnd :(
> |>
> |> Feedback?
> |>
> |> vlada
> |>
> |>
> |> On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, marc fleury wrote:
> |>
> |> > Bla enough talk, add the f*cking line already
> |> >
> |> > ||I still don't see anything wrong with type check for
> |> > ||org.jboss.util.Service.
> |> > ||Vladimir
> |> >
> |> > "code with your balls on the keyboard"
> |> >
> |> > _______________________________________________
> |> > Jboss-development mailing list
> |> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> |> >
> |>
> |>
> |> _______________________________________________
> |> Jboss-development mailing list
> |> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> |>
> |
> |
> |_______________________________________________
> |Jboss-development mailing list
> |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
