Yup, Especially those of us that are using direct SQL calls using the connection pools. Am I correct here? Bill -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of danch Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 4:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-416812 ] Removed res-jndi-namejava: prefix need Is it possible that people upgrading will need to put the 'java:' back into their res-jndi-names where appropriate? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Change Notes item #416812, was updated on 2001-04-17 12:47 > You can respond by visiting: > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=381174&aid=416812&group_id= 22866 > > Category: None > Group: v2.2.1 > Status: Open > Priority: 5 > Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm) > Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) > Summary: Removed res-jndi-name java: prefix need > > Initial Comment: > Fixed bug #414854. > The requirement that the res-jndi-name be prefixed > with java: has been removed from the > ApplicationMetaData class. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > You can respond by visiting: > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=381174&aid=416812&group_id= 22866 > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development Confidential e-mail for addressee only. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy the original communication. _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
