Perhaps stable was the wrong word. I am hoping we don't go to pd3 with
dependent objects back in for example. As for aiding competition, clearly
the vendors will make sure that there are fuzzy areas where they can bash
each other, that is just life. Look at other 'standards' such as SQL.
If they don't get on with it soon (meaning ejb 2.0 done), it will not bode
well for j2ee imho.
Cheers
Jay
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Archer
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 4/27/01 10:50 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] EJB 2.0 Spec PD2
Hahahahahahahahaha!!!!!
OK, so I hope your right, but it seems these guys have too much money on
the line to allow a stable spec that aids competition.
I'm completely disgusted with that entire process.
Jim
--On Friday, April 27, 2001 11:24 AM -0400 Jay Walters
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So now the EJB 2.0 Public draft 2 has been released. Any ideas about
how
> stable it will be? It has been a long time coming and I am hoping
that
> the fighting has been done and now it's just about ready to go.
>
> Cheers
> Jay
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
********************************************
I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I -
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.
- Robert Frost, 1916
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
