Marc,
Someone has already implemented something that has the
same effect.
I am working with the latest JBoss from CVS and it no
longer tries to control the lifecycle of Jetty MBeans.
You should have a look back through the ServiceControl
CVS log.
Jules
--- marc fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
org.jboss.util.ServiceControl
>
> it strikes as a static "startup" kinda thing. The
> MBeanRegistration thing
> is for runtime as well. However it doesn't seem to
> start properly from a
> JBoss standpoint.
>
> I think it ties back to what needs to be controlled
> by JBoss. I am strongly
> going towards a JBoss specific MBean that would wrap
> the native MBean. We
> would detect the JBoss: string and know that we need
> to be aware of its
> existence. I believe it is a very lightweight
> implementation of the scoping
> of management.
>
> I will implement this bit when I have a moment.
> This way the jetty guys
> will not be called and we only call the managed bit,
> again a lightweight
> solution.
>
> marc
>
> _________________
> Marc Fleury, Ph.D
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
