poo poo!
;-D
--Juha
At 07:08 1.6.2001 -0700, you wrote:
>This is something that was suggested at the Atlanta training and Marc
liked so
>you need to slap him around. I was not particularly in favor of it and
that seems
>to be the general feeling so let's roll the change back.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Juha-P Lindfors" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 3:15 AM
>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JMSContainerInvoker.java
>
>
>
>
>On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Peter Antman wrote:
>>
>> You see what will happen? Yes, the client will send its messages to one
>> topic (no automatic creation here), and the MDB will listen on ANOTHER
>> topic, namely a to the system unknown destination, since it was not
>> correctly spelled.
>>
>> What do you other guys say on the list? Hiram?
>
>I agree with you it's not a good change. If the developer has made a
>mistake in his code or forgot to add the topic he should be warned during
>the deployment, instead of allowing the application to silently fail.
>
>Also, since the created topics are persistent, this requires the developer
>to go clean up the jbossmq configuration file from time to time to make
>sure resources aren't wasted on topics that never meant to be there in the
>first place. I think thats worse than the requirement of having to create
>the topic upfront, especially since the developer may not even be aware he is
>accidentally creating new topics.
>
>So if the idea was to help the developer to avoid finding out about our
>obscure configuration files, I think this change may have made the problem
>even worse. Now you HAVE TO go browse them, just to fix your typos that
>won't go away.
>
>-- Juha
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Jboss-development mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
