Sure. The bigger question is how many access points into JBoss via RMI semantics have the issue found with the EJB finders. If the common implementation assumption is that arguments that would be pass by copy under RMI semantics are writable by the implementation then we should make more noise about the potential problems with using the Optimized=true setting. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Burke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 10:49 AM Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Should CacheKey copy its id on creation? > My bad, I didn't look hard enough. > > Forgive me? :-) > > Bill _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
- [JBoss-dev] Should CacheKey copy its id on creation? Bill Burke
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Should CacheKey copy its id on creation... marc fleury
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Should CacheKey copy its id on crea... Bill Burke
- Re: [JBoss-dev] Should CacheKey copy its id on ... Scott M Stark
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Should CacheKey copy its id... Bill Burke
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Should CacheKey copy i... marc fleury
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Should CacheKey copy i... Scott M Stark
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Should CacheKey copy its id on ... marc fleury
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Should CacheKey copy its id... Bill Burke
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Should CacheKey copy i... marc fleury
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Should CacheKey co... Bill Burke
- Re: [JBoss-dev] Should CacheKey copy its id on ... Georg Rehfeld
- RE: [JBoss-dev] Should CacheKey copy its id on creation... Jay Walters