On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 04:21:12PM -0400, Bill Burke wrote:
>
>
> > > Any way, I think I should roll back my change. If you agree
> > marc, just say
> > > so and it is done.
> > >
> > > I don't know any thing about Minerva, so if you want that
> > changed, someone
> > > else would be better suited. If no one wants to do it, I'll look at it.
> > >
> > > -dain
> > >
> >
>
> I know what to do for Minerva(aka org.jboss.pool.jdbc, correct?) and can put
> these changes in. But I really wouldn't know what to do with JCA, that is,
> if a change is required there as well.
I think that this is a sane thing to add to JBossPool. It is unrelated to
JCA as it is a JDBC-only thing. It would be a configuration option for
the resource adapter if you were using a JDBC resource adapter.
There is a JDBC resource adpater in JBossPool. I can't recall exactly
how it is configured, but I think that it is passed a set of properties
that are passed straight through to the underlying pool, so it might
be possible to make no changes to the resource adapter in order to take
advantage of the isolation level setting.
I say make the change to the JDBC pooling code and I'll look at the
resource adpater implications when I get around to spending time on
JBoss again (at which point I'll remove direct access to the pools
and make it purely JCA based).
Toby.
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
