> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 5:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update:
> jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/jdbc JDBCCommand.java
>
>
> |different bean types by attaching different pools to those beans. You're
> |totally right that without true XA and 2pc, using 2 different pools is
> |probably a bad idea and should be avoided at all costs.
>
>
> not so fast :)
>
> actually we can use the isolation levels (which is an important
> thing) if we
> say clearly
>
> "don't go using 2 pools and many IL within one transaction if
> your database
> driver doesn't support 2 phase commit".
>
> But if you want to do a transaction with only one isolation level
> in it then
> this is perfectly fine, and in fact i suspect that if stuff goes right the
> 2pc will work just fine, it is just if stuff goes wrong that it might be a
> bit tricky,
>
> it is not because the jdbc drivers are messy that we should not offer the
> feature.
>
> Since there is no other way to offer the feature, I am all for using the 2
> pools now :P
>
Man, you're making me dizzy!
> fuck bad XA support
>
Yeah, fuckum.
bill
P.S. Does JAWS actually work with any XA drivers(especially Oracle?). I'll
give it a try when I get a chance.
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
