this has been bothering me for quite some time... did I just embarrass myself? do you guys know? marcf |-----Original Message----- |From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 6:32 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: registerSync on rolledback transaction | | |Hi, | |sorry if this has been addressed before, I am a bit of a newbie on |this list | |I want to register a synchronization on a transaction that was |marked for rollback. | |I am curious as to why the spec decides to throw a RollbackException. | |I mean I *have* the tx, if I wanted to do something about a marked |for rollback thingy all I have to do is |tx.getStatus().equals(Status.blabla_marked_for_rollback) and |decide. If I WANT to be notified of the tx demarcation event, |wether that be commit or rollback, is none of the tx' business. | |In other words, I am surprised by the assymetry you artificially |introduce between commit and rollback on the registration of |synchronizations. Why should the possible outcome affect the |registration at all?. | |Finally, sorry if this has been adressed as well and I know this |is JTA, but... what is a TM to do ? :) my guts tell me "register |the damn synchronization" (per the above) | |please include me in any response as I am not on this list. | |thanks | |marcf | | |_________________ |Marc Fleury, Ph.D |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |_________________ _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
