what what bothers me with this on-going discussion: we don't care whether
you fuck up your own hashcode or not, we wrap it up and afaik Bill plugged
teh last hole there, so that should really be tight as a drum...
show me a clear bug repro on this and I will buy it... if it is plain gone
then let's burry it.
we need closure not impressions.
marcf
|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Vincent Harcq
|Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 11:29 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Any problems vith the cache in 2.4?
|
|
|Yep.
|I am working on 2.5. Checked out every week or so.
|
|But the problem of Hiram is its hashCode of, "my hand in the fire".
|
|> the changes of the cache are found in 2.5. I might retrofit them
|> to 2.4 for
|> other reasons.
|>
|> are you using 2.5 when you say the problems are gone?
|>
|> |I got this one also.
|> |It disappeared.
|> |I think (not sure) it was because of my bloody hashCode() method.
|> |Maybe it is linked to recent changes on cvs version through.
|>
|>
|> marcf
|>
|>
|>
|> _______________________________________________
|> Jboss-development mailing list
|> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|>
|>
|
|_______________________________________________
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
