Until there is a JBoss 3.0 that allows the server to be downloaded and setup with
a given configuration I don't think distributed tests are worth the trouble to setup.
Once you have the ability to instatiate a configuration dynamically then the test
wanting to perform a multi-server test simply spawns the remote configuration
that is required for the test.
> On a similar note, I think that it might be a good idea to setup some
> multi-vm tests, but I am stuck on what the best way to do that would be. I
> am thinking that we could define a few extra config's like test1...testn (or
> something like that).
>
> Perhaps the current default config would remain the same for running all
> invm test, then test1 through testn would be used for multi vm tests. We
> will definatly have to come up with something to test distributed
> transactions and such.
>
> There are some tricky bits, like how to deploy (do you just deploy to one
> vm, leaving the other vanilla from its startup config). I think as a start
> this might work and possibly even produce the problem that I am seeing,
> though I am not sure. It might be that I need to deploy to at least to
> 2 vm's with a total of 3, one for the seperate JMS server).
>
> I am going to ponder this some more, if you or anyone has any ideas I would
> like to hear them.
>
> In the mean time I am going to backport some parts of my app to the previous
> version of JBoss, which might take some time, but will releave some stress.
>
> I also wanted to write up something on the build system that I started using
> here at work and with some of my other projects, which I think will fit in
> perfectly here. I was going to write that sooner, but then I ran into this
> wall. =|
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> >
> > Jason,
> >
> > then I have a feeling that this could have something to do with the changes
> > that I recently made to the threading model that JBossMQ uses.
> >
> > What's the easiest way you think I could reproduce the bug on my systems??
> >
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > >From: Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] EntityInstanceInterceptor change
> > >Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 19:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
> > >
> > >Ok, I have verified that if the jbossmq.jar (and jbossmq-client.jar) from
> > >the 2.1-BETA-Mar-26-2001 build are used that everything works fine. The
> > >only thing I had to change was the router jboss.jcml changing INVM stuff to
> > >RMI (which it was not even using) and remove the INVM stuff from
> > >jbossmq.xml.
> > >
> > >I ran the exact same test and it finished flawlessly.
> > >
> > >--jason
> > >
> > >
> > >On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
> > >
> > > > Do you have the timeout msg that is logged?
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The first odd thing is that when it times out a message is logged, but
> > >the
> > > > > thread still hangs. Should it be interrupted or something?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Jboss-development mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Jboss-development mailing list
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jboss-development mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
