Isn't SOAP nothing more than human readable IIOP?  Or is it more?

Bill

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan -
> Blue Lotus Software
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] URGENCY? WSDL/UDDI/ebXML
> 
> 
> Just a quick question.  Is the preference to use ebXML for web services
> instead of SOAP?  In addition to SOAP?  What about the efforts to wrap
> IBM/Apache's SOAP stuff in MBeans?
> 
> The reason I ask is that I saw a technical demonstration of ebXML and the
> XML-One conference in London about 5 months ago, and it looked seriously
> undercooked.  As in, it looked like the demo was held together by 
> bubblegum
> and duct tape.  I had since written it off as the non-MS solution 
> to compete
> with SOAP (yes, I know ebXML has many features that are EDI-like, in
> addition to the services side ebXML offers).  Furthermore, with 
> IBM throwing
> their weight behind SOAP, and Sun claiming they will "fully 
> support" SOAP in
> the future, it seemed to me that WSDL/UDDI/SOAP made more sense.  
> Of course,
> if the plan is to have both, then never mind....
> 
> -dan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> ...
> 
> > 4- we NEED TO HAVE WSDL/UDDI/ebXML SOON,
> 
> ...
> 
> > marcf
> >
> >
> > _________________
> > Marc Fleury, Ph.D
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > _________________
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> 


_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to