Let's not worry about micro-management level details in main that are going
to
change.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Container.java
> Is there any reason why we are explicitly use DefaultDomain:XXX and
> implicily with :XXX in several places now? How about using :XXX
everywhere
> instead of DefaultDomain:XXX since it just takes up more space.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Andreas Schaefer wrote:
>
> > Hi Jasson
> >
> > Yes, I plan to reorganize the MBean Object Names for the implementation
> > of the server-side JBossMGT.
> > According to their spec it would be maybe good to have something like
this:
> > - domain: is the JBoss server instance which can be default be the host
> > computer
> > name but should be able to renamed
> > - properties:
> > - group: where this component belongs to
> > - type: type of component
> > - name: name of the component
> >
> > The domain should keep an unique name on the network / management domain
> > because we maybe use a federation to access MBeans and then it is
important
> > to have this.
> >
> > Andy
> >
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
