On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 12:17:26PM -0700, Jason Dillon wrote: > I would go for clearer names over legacy names. I agree, although ManagedConnectionFactoryProperties is enormously long. I would go for JNDIName over ConnectionFactoryName. Toby. > On Sun, 19 Aug 2001, David Jencks wrote: > > > I'd like to suggest that we (I) change some of the attribute names in > > ConnectionFactoryLoader in jboss.jcml to make it a little clearer what they > > are for: > > > > new old > > > > ManagedConnectionFactoryProperties Properties > > ConnectionFactoryName -- or --JndiName FactoryName > > > > > > I'd also like to do this soon before many people start using them. > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > david jencks _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
