I think just the custom logging class that replaces the existing Log, Logger
and
JBossCategory and the use of TRACE. I'm in agreement with you on this
items so unless there is other input to the contrary the details of the new
Logger or
whatever is all that remains. Due to the proposed change to have a Logger
class in
log4j we probably don't want to use Logger as a classname to minmize name
clash issues.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] log4j switchover - anyone working on this?


> > We need to agree on and formalize our logging convention and then move
to it.
>
> Let us do this.  Logging is a critical system.
>
> What is left to decide?
>
> --jason
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>


_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to