I don't have a problem with requiring a JDK, and I'm sure that shipping
tools.jar is not allowed if one actually took time to read the license page
before downloadin the JDK.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] javac.jar
> I tried to rebuild with a 1.3.1 tools.jar (javac.jar) and now I am getting
> errors from some javadoc stuff... I just can't win.
>
> Why can't we assume that users have JDK installed? Perhaps I should add a
> tools.jar from a win32 build...
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
>
> > I have no idea where it came from and the JDK tools.jar is the newer
> > version.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 6:04 PM
> > Subject: [JBoss-dev] javac.jar
> >
> >
> > > Looks like this has an older compiler which can't handle some language
> > > features.
> > >
> > > Where did this come from? How can we get a newer version?
> > >
> > > --jason
> > >
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
