On 11 Sep, Jason Dillon wrote: > Should setRollbackOnly on an MDB with NotSupported simply be ignored rather > than throwing an exception? > > If not, then an MDB would have to be written to handle exceptions for these > cases when it is configured to be Requires or NotSupported... which seems > like a bad idea. I am inclined to agree, and maybe I have intepreted the spec wrong. The behaviour now is from section 15.15.1 (at least in the spec I read now), where it is said that it has to throw IllegalState if these methods are invoked under BMT or when bean is "not associated with a transaction" or does not have a "meaningfull transaction context". Question is: is it possible to inteprete NotSupported as a "meaningfull transactional context" //Peter > > --jason > > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Peter Antman Technology in Media, Box 34105 100 26 Stockholm Systems Architect WWW: http://www.tim.se Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.backsource.org Phone: +46-(0)8-506 381 11 Mobile: 070-675 3942 ------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
