On 2001.09.20 18:27:19 -0400 marc fleury wrote:
> |So... if virtual host = security domain, do we also have a classloader
> |(ServiceLibrary/Scope type thing) for it? Is this the same as the
>
> That is how I understand it from Scott's email but maybe he means
> something
> else in which case the mapping is not that straight-forward
>
>
> |application classloader or is it the parent classloader of the
> application
> |classloader?
>
> The system classloader is always the parent of the application class
> loader.
>
> I remember someone in London making a case for unification of both... I
> don't see it anymore, we will see in the future, for now, keep them
> separate
> with system (rh) parent to app (scoped)
>
> marcf
well, it seems to me that there is always going to be a spine classloader,
and for each application an application classloader. Now if an ear or
other "application" say includes some sars, do they get loaded with the
system classloader or the application classloader? I'd tend to think the
application classloader.
I haven't had a chance to really investigate, is there a fundamental
difference between your new classloader scheme and the scoped classloader?
Can we unify them at some point?
david jencks
<snip>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
