you can't win them all
the SAR stuff is yours
marcf
|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 7:08 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] exposing boot sequence & richer xml config
|
|
|ouch, ouch.
|
|--jason
|
|
|On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, marc fleury wrote:
|
|> |We are expecting configuration files to be under the given
|url/conf/config,
|> |which is unneeded.
|>
|> configuration files should be in XML/JMX format and if they are
|not the last
|> thing we want is have them scattered everywhere.
|>
|> |> > 2) Setup logging as soon as possible.
|> |> This is obviously a good idea, I'm not sure how much sooner
|it can get if
|> |> its run through an mbean and loaded with a recyclable classloader.
|> |
|> |We already setup logging really soon, but we don't expose the
|configuration
|> |of the logging service... which is bad.
|>
|> Yes but it doesnt justify the clumsy classloaded idea. We still use
|> log4j.xml.
|>
|> |What? I am talking about the configuration file for booting the server.
|>
|> This doesn't change so don't offer it.
|>
|> |This does not fall over into service.xml files at all. I want
|to control
|> |how JBoss boots with out having to write/maintain my own
|version of Main or
|> |a custom boot system.
|>
|> Jason, we are going to cut this discussion short. In the year and a half
|> that 2.0 is out I have not seen a single case of someone overwriting the
|> "setup" sequence, ever! So it is gone. I didn't remove the spartian MLet
|> semantic to see it replaced with something inferior.
|>
|> This is mental diarreah... there are many other places where you would be
|> more useful, this is not one... MOVE ON!
|>
|> |The current system makes many assumptions about how the
|> |configuration of the
|> |system will be laid out, which is not a good idea.
|>
|> ????
|>
|>
|> |> > I personally have not made use of the JBoss distribution
|layout, ever.
|> |> > It
|> |> > has never fit in with my deployment scheme.
|> |>
|> |> Is this still so true with the new web-deploy stuff from marc?
|> |Currently, to use a set of configs you need to:
|> |
|> | ./run.sh --net-install http://configserver --configuration myconfig
|> |
|> |What I suggest is that we replace this with:
|> |
|> | ./run.sh http://configserver/myconfig
|> |
|> |or
|> |
|> | ./run.sh http://configserver?config=myconfig
|> |
|> |or any other way you choose to implement the JSP/Servlet which
|> |serves up the
|> |config.
|>
|> Yes that is interesting but down the road, you guys are fighting in la-la
|> land right now.
|>
|> ENOUGH!
|>
|> marcf
|>
|> |--jason
|> |
|> |
|> |_______________________________________________
|> |Jboss-development mailing list
|> |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|>
|>
|> _______________________________________________
|> Jboss-development mailing list
|> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|>
|
|
|_______________________________________________
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
