This is a good point. The logic should be easily convertible. Hey aren't
you glad that we at least detect connection failures now?? ;)
Regards,
Hiram
>From: Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JMS ExceptionListener not working any more?!
>Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 22:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Why not a shared timer thread to reduce thread usage?
>
>--jason
>
>
>On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
> > Peter,
> >
> > I have just fixed this bug in the HEAD branch. Every connection now has
>a
> > thread that pings the server every 1 min. So, if the server goes down,
> > failure should be detected within that amount of time.
> >
> > This should even apply to the RMI IL (the ExceptionListener handeling
>was
> > really screwed for RMI since RMI is stateless).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > >From: Peter Antman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: [JBoss-dev] JMS ExceptionListener not working any more?!
> > >Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:13:43 +0200 (CEST)
> > >
> > >Hi,
> > >we have had complaint in the messaging forum that the
> > >setExceptionListener (ExceptionListener.onException()). Does not work
> > >(any more).
> > >
> > >Up to and including 2.2.1 we have the following behaviour for the
> > >exception handling:
> > >
> > >If a client was connected and has received at least on message, the
> > >exception listener would get called if the server went down.
> > >
> > >If the client had not received a message, it would hang forever if the
> > >server went down.
> > >
> > >This was not a perfect behaviour (if server for example was restarted
> > >several time before any messages was sent, the client would be lost)
>but
> > >it worked resonable ok. And it was much better that having no support
> > >for the exception listener at all.
> > >
> > >Why is this not working any longer? Was it a strategic decision to
> > >remove the support for it, or some hierto undiscovered side-effect of
> > >some other changes?
> > >
> > >Any chance we could ge that support back into JBossMQ (and preferably
> > >also some cind of support for lost connection without any messages
> > >having to be received first)?
> > >
> > >//Peter
> > >--
> > >Jobba hos oss: http://www.tim.se/weblab
> > >------------------------------------------------------------
> > >Peter Antman Technology in Media, Box 34105 100 26 Stockholm
> > >Systems Architect WWW: http://www.tim.se
> > >Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.backsource.org
> > >Phone: +46-(0)8-506 381 11 Mobile: 070-675 3942
> > >------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Jboss-development mailing list
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
>http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jboss-development mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Jboss-development mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
