Sorry for the late response. I don't *think* this is an issue currently.
There are no other resources involved except the jms bits to pull a msg off
from and hand it to the mdb.
--jason
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, David Jencks wrote:
> Jason, I have no idea if this is relevant...
>
> I discovered in the ConnectionManager/pool code that the scheduling is kind
> of awful, and that under high load, if the pool gets emptied and a request
> has to wait, that request is apt to wait more or less forever, since it is
> blocking and new requests take any available connections without blocking.
> (I discovered this by putting a blocking timeout in the pool and running
> the high stress (10 threads, 1000 iterations) bank test. After a little
> while I got a few exceptions from blocking timeout.) Is there any chance
> this is happening to you? A crude fix that might work would be to make
> every new request block if any request is blocking when the new one comes
> in: this gives everyone a chance at intercepting the "returned"
> notifyAll(). I've been wondering about how or if to implement strict
> scheduling, and kind of forgot this code is used by jmsra in 2.4. If you
> think this might be relevant and want me to suggest a more specific fix let
> me know.
>
> Thanks
> david jencks
>
>
> On 2001.09.25 16:31:44 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote:
> > I ran some tests last night with the
> > TransactionManager.TransactionTimeout
> > set to Integer.MAX_VALUE, and I am still getting these messages:
> >
> > org.jboss.tm.TxCapsule [Thread-5] () - Transaction XidImpl [FormatId=257,
> > GlobalId=eng-ecr5a//0, BranchQual=] timed out. status=STATUS_ACTIVE
> >
> > This is still off of a pre-3.0 release... I have been resistent to moving
> > to
> > 3.0 due to the months of work that I had to do (and the stress to
> > stabilize
> > the system) to make everything work with the jms ra, entity locking and
> > so
> > on.
> >
> > I guess I should probably look into this a little bit more though, since
> > it
> > is going to be very difficult to track down this problem on an old
> > build...
> > =(
> >
> > --jason
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > The problem is that I want to basicly use a local TX with a MQ
> > XAConnection.
> > > If knew how to generate vaid XIDs to feed the XAResource, then we
> > could
> > > emulate the TM. But I'm not 100% on
> > > how to generate XIDs, so hacked a JBossMQ specific solution.
> > >
> > > Anybody know how to generate valid XIDs??? At least valid enough to
> > control
> > > a 1 phase commit resource???
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Hiram
> > >
> > > >From: Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MDB non-xa cf & tx timeout
> > > >Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 18:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
> > > >
> > > >Why does StdServerSession hard code JBossMQ specifics
> > (JBossMQTXInterface
> > > >& the related classnames and such)?
> > > >
> > > >--jason
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > No, Not yet... I guess I should also do the same for CMT that has
> > > > > NotSupported right???
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Hiram
> > > > >
> > > > > >From: Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > >Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MDB non-xa cf & tx timeout
> > > > > >Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 20:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Hey, sorry for the late reply. What about CMT? Shouldn't CMT
> > behave
> > > >the
> > > > > >same in this case?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >The system I run this under uses the old style config. Is this
> > change
> > > > > >relavent for integration with 2.4.x? I think I might switch over
> > to
> > > >that
> > > > > >for production use... head is changing to quickly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >--jason
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Jason,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Anyways, I think there is still an issue with the tx recipts
> > for an
> > > > > >MDB. I
> > > > > > > >have to set the default tx timeout insainly high to avoid this
> > > >problem.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >I remember there were a few suggestions on how to fix this,
> > but I
> > > >am
> > > > > >not
> > > > > > > >sure what happend to them...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I just commited chanages to HEAD that should fix this for MDB
> > with
> > > >BMT.
> > > > > > > Pease test and let me know if it worked.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Hiram
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> > > > > >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Jboss-development mailing list
> > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >_______________________________________________
> > > > > >Jboss-development mailing list
> > > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> > > >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Jboss-development mailing list
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >Jboss-development mailing list
> > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Jboss-development mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jboss-development mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
