Sorry, you are right. I was looking at the wrong place, and misunderstood my error message. SAX is damn complicated when you try to use more than trivial things.
Discard my previous message. > -----Mensaje original----- > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Scott > M Stark > Enviado el: viernes, 09 de noviembre de 2001 19:18 > Para: JBoss-Dev > Asunto: Re: [JBoss-dev] SAX version being used > > > We do not use the deprecated org.xml.sax.Parser interface as we > use JAXP to abstract out the parser creation. This allows any user > to configure whichever parser they want without any code changes > to JBoss. I don't know Ignacio is looking at to see the org.xml.sax.Parser > interface. > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Scott Stark > Chief Technology Officer > JBoss Group, LLC > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Ignacio Coloma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "JBoss-Dev" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 10:56 AM > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] SAX version being used > > > > I have no appreciation for these thingies... can someone tell us what we > > should be using here? > > > > SAX2 sounds newer, that's about the depth of my knowledge there. > > > > marcf > > > > |-----Original Message----- > > |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > |Ignacio Coloma > > |Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:39 PM > > |To: JBoss-Dev > > |Subject: [JBoss-dev] SAX version being used > > | > > | > > |AFAIK currently JBoss is using SAX 1. That means that you are > using such > > |deprecated things as the org.xml.sax.Parser interface. I think it's ok, > > |since XML parsing doesn't add really much. But in our current > project we > > |wished to use the SAX 2 library that comes with Xalan. The SAX > > |library needs > > |some system properties, the question is if are you thinking about > upgrading > > |the parser in the long run, or really don't care too much about it. > > | > > |See that the xalan library currently is up-to-date, but the parser is > > |generated using deprecated clases (via crimson). > > | > > | > > |_______________________________________________ > > |Jboss-development mailing list > > |[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
