On 2001.11.12 20:37:24 -0500 Hiram Chirino wrote: > >It looks to me as if > >"Because of quirkiness of JavaGroups, services cannot ask for > > > state-synchronization once the Group connection has been initiated." > >means exactly that the ClusterPartition HAS to know EXACTLY which > services > >are using it. If you do this, the mbean-ref-list will give you what you > >want. Otherwise, can you explain how these two statements don't > contradict > >each other? > > > >Won't having this complete list let you hot deploy a ClusterPartition? > How > >would this be different than server start-up? > >I think explicitly stating the dependencies is a good idea, even if they > >are caused by a limitation of JavaGroups. > > > >david > > > > This seem like a good idea. What would the XML syntax be for specifying > a > mbean reference list?
<mbean-ref-list name="ClusterServices"> <mbean-ref-list-element>JBossCluster:service=HAJNDI,name=dave</mbean-ref-list-element> <mbean-ref-list-element>JBossCluster:service=HATM,name=dave</mbean-ref-list-element> <mbean-ref-list-element>JBossCluster:service=HARARDeployer,name=dave</mbean-ref-list-element> </mbean-ref-list> then <mbean .... name="JBossCluster:service=HAJNDI,name=dave"> ... </mbean> etc can be in any service file, the mbean with the mbean-ref-list won't start until all the mbeans in the list are started, and will stop if any are stopped. david > > Regards, > Hiram > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp > > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
