Ok, rereading my answer I want to say I am sorry for the tone of the mail.
The install for JBoss is super easy and even more with RH. Making platform specific install makes little sense. Only if they are included in the respective distros do they make sense. We have been down this road before. Mucho pain (these mails) very very little gain. Then we do have requirements on what we need to make JBoss work. When all is said and all is done the only advantage for us would be inclusion in the standard linux versions which would probably increase our market penetration, that is good. But this is a minor problem and we are not about to significantly change build or install for that marcf |-----Original Message----- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Adam |Heath |Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 4:56 AM |To: Jason Dillon |Cc: Dain Sundstrom; 'Andrew Scherpbier'; JBoss Development |Subject: RE: LONG: RE: [JBoss-dev] can't build jboss from cvs | | |On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, Jason Dillon wrote: | |> Makming a .deb (or a .rpm) for JBoss means that installs on platforms for |> which those formats are supoported (or the default) will become |much easier. |> While it is true that the current .zip or .tgz formats are simple to use, |> some folks simply prefer to have a package (while others will insist on a |> raw archive or simply build from cvs). |> |> [snip] | |I'll respond to this when I have some sleep. I've been up too long. | | |_______________________________________________ |Jboss-development mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
