Shouldn't the java.lang.reflect.Proxy stuff be used instead? Isn't this for
pre 1.3 support, which isn't really supported anymore?
--jason
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Peter Levart wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> There's a buggy method in org.jboss.proxy.Proxies.Impl that caused every
> entity bean instance of the same type to be of different Class and using
> different ClassLoader. There might be other places in the code that are using
> proxy generation and are producing different Class objects and ClassLoaders
> for every instance of the proxy that implements the same interfaces. That's a
> waste of space and time at minimum.
>
> Here's the patch to correct this:
>
> *** Proxies.java~ Wed Nov 28 17:39:17 2001
> --- Proxies.java Wed Nov 28 17:39:17 2001
> ***************
> *** 300,306 ****
> // (duplication and reordering are ignored)
> static boolean sameTypes(Class tt1[], Class tt2[])
> {
> ! if (tt1.length == 1 && tt2.length == 0)
> {
> return tt1[0] == tt2[0];
> }
> --- 300,306 ----
> // (duplication and reordering are ignored)
> static boolean sameTypes(Class tt1[], Class tt2[])
> {
> ! if (tt1.length == 1 && tt2.length == 1)
> {
> return tt1[0] == tt2[0];
> }
> ***************
> *** 335,341 ****
> totalSeen2 += seen2;
> }
> // now, each element of tt2 must have been visited
> ! return totalSeen2 != tt2.length;
> }
>
> static Class[] copyAndUniquify(Class targetTypes[])
> --- 335,341 ----
> totalSeen2 += seen2;
> }
> // now, each element of tt2 must have been visited
> ! return totalSeen2 == tt2.length;
> }
>
> static Class[] copyAndUniquify(Class targetTypes[])
> ***************
> *** 729,731 ****
> --- 729,732 ----
> }
> }
> }
> +
>
>
> Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
