|For what its worth I think the jar dependency tracking stuff is the only
|stuff in need of a rethink, the mbean-ref and classpath syntax I am quite
|happy with.

same here

that and the standard xml file being a nightmare of bits and pieces that
really should be a standard file.

It's a small point

|If you have an mbean with a number of mbean refs in it and hot undeploy and
|hot redeploy the mbean while the server is running, something in the
|dependency tracking seems to go haywire because when you shut the server
|down your mbean is then undeployed once for each mbean ref it contains i.e.
|it is undeployed multiple times.
|
|If you haven't hot undeployed and redeployed then this doesn't happen.

I will keep it in mind

marcf

|
|David
|
|> he he...
|>
|> in fact 2 problems one real one fake
|>
|> the fake: 'depends' removal  i have been working on my
|> codebase for the past
|> 3weeks and the code was update by david j last week :) I was
|> missing it but
|> I did update the server deployer hence panic...my bad
|>
|> the real: the classpath explicit thingy, I think the davidM idea of
|> wildcards is important and I really can't fathom why we are
|> tracking *jars*
|> ... weird.  please explain I might be missing it
|> the real2: the over the board service.xml I think we got that covered.
|>
|> marcf
|>
|>
|
|---
|Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
|Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
|Version: 6.0.303 / Virus Database: 164 - Release Date: 11/24/2001
|
|
|_______________________________________________
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to