> Now I'm getting confused... > Is it sufficient to have more control over deployment > ordering? > > Who likes the list of directories approach?
Guys <from the mine> I am rewriting still some stuff in the controller, I reimplemented the "depends" on the explicit mbean name, did away with some mbean-ref stuff. This is simple for now, Really and I mean it, lately on this list we have a tendency to complicate simple things, I think it is due to developers over-engineering features. And really that is not good, we need to keep our reputation in "ease of administration" and all this is not going in that direction. Let me commit (I am dying here) and we will take it from there. working low tech is good tech, broken high tech is bad tech. remember this is open source and if *I* have to read a class for 2 days before I understanding what it is trying to do, and then realize what it is trying to do is not really useful, this is really irritating and will kill our codebase in the short run. Open Source is about maintaining codebases in the open, if the SOURCE fails to do that, the rest of the construction fails as well. I know I proposed the run levels myself, and I am not shutting down the proposal, it will probably be a simple way to non-explicitely build dependencies between starting units. (BTW I reimplemented the page scope thing and stepped create/start bill was bitching about) But for now, let's see how the simple depend works. I think we will find it covers most cases and the code went from 500 lines down to about 40... I really try to make as simple as I can... I really try marcf ______________________________________________________________________ View this jboss-dev thread in the online forums: http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=5378 _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
