On 2002.01.20 03:11:47 -0500 Adam Heath wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, marc fleury wrote:
>
> > /**
> > * Gets the FilenameFilter that the AutoDeployer uses to decide
> which files
> > * will be deployed by the ServiceDeployer. Currently .jsr, .sar,
> and files
> > * ending in service.xml are accepted.
> > *
> > * @return The FileNameFilter for use by the AutoDeployer.
> > */
> > public boolean accepts(DeploymentInfo di)
> > {
> > return (di.url.toString().endsWith(".sar")
> > || di.url.toString().endsWith("service.xml"));
> > }
>
> Should this also test for '.jsr' like the documentation says, or should
> the
> docs be updated?
>
The docs should be updated. Lets stick with one extension, .sar. jsr
looks too much like java specification request.
davidjencks
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
