yes yes of course, let's go and finish this one. marcf
|-----Original Message----- |From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 4:45 PM |To: marc fleury |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Can we have funtional freeze? | | |Is our goal to be fully EJB 2.0 compliant in JBoss 2.0. If so, I |will need to |add one or two more features. I think we should consider a freeze of new |features not required in the spec (basically, we freeze but consider spec |violations bugs). | |-dain | |Quoting marc fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | |> |like. If noone minds my doing that between 3.0 and 3.1, I can wait. |> |> OK great there is a ton of stuff in 3.0, and we have a super-charged, |> mean |> little Rabbit already. |> |> Re: JCA No need to go and puncture a hole in BEA talk on "JCA/EAI |> justifies |> $50,000 when JBoss gives it for free" quite yet. We can give them a |> couple |> of weeks more to be milking that fake cow... go go go, rake in the |> Dollars |> selling over-priced software, Microsoft is coming and the only gate |> keepers |> are going to be us. Storm a'comin, everyone stay cool. |> |> Bill, you win, throw a party today, we will feature freeze once DR1 is |> out, |> which should be really soon now, couple days/week at most. |> |> marcf |> |> "The plasticmen are coming! they're coming!" |> -- Doctoring the house, ca 1989 -- |> |> |> _______________________________________________ |> Jboss-development mailing list |> [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development |> _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
