Yeah.. I am thinking of hashing the ON and just passing that in the proxy. Would really give the proxy. Must be done at the proxy level with static maps, i.e. a total hack :)
Fine by me frankly. I will try to do that tomorrow. Expect dramatic speed increases on these puppies very soon :) marcf |-----Original Message----- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David |Jencks |Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:14 PM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] new ObjectName(String) is a pig | | |There is a fair amount of code that does something like this in a loop: | | |server.invoke(new ObjectName(<static constant>, "op", <variable args>...); | |I guess we should hunt it all down whether or not juha's is much faster -- |it's really no harder to cache the ObjectName than the string. | |david jencks | |On 2002.02.05 01:52:59 -0500 marc fleury wrote: |> A big pig... chewing up 0.04 ms on a 0.06 container time for a total of |> 0.1ms ... ouch... |> |> So much for JMX dynamic invocation if we lose the time there... I will |> fix |> that easily. |> |> we need to be able to encode that better if we want to gain time. Maybe |> Juha's et al JMX implementation will shine here, because this guy is a |> pig |> in the reference implementation |> |> marcf |> |> |> _______________________________________________ |> Jboss-development mailing list |> [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development |> |> | |_______________________________________________ |Jboss-development mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
